Legal Opinion
Tate v. MacFarland
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 13, 1982No. 765 and 911PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
These are cross appeals from an order entered on Charles Tate’s preliminary objections in the nature of a motion to strike Salvatore DelCiotto’s answer to Tate’s complaint in trespass against DelCiotto. 1 Both appeals will be quashed.
In his complaint Tate alleged that he had been injured on September 25, 1978, while repairing the roof of the building at 3617 Haverford Avenue in Philadelphia, and that his injuries were in various ways the result of the negligence of Salvatore DelCiotto, who, he alleged, “owned, maintained and exclusively controlled” the building. The complaint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- DeRugeriis v. BrenerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Marshall v. PowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Aloi v. AloiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Napet, Inc. v. John Benkart & Sons Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foust v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. EylerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- James A. Mann, Inc. v. Upper Darby School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Noll v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Rollins Outdoor Advertising Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.