Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Powers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1978No. 125PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this case, the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia granted a motion by the plaintiff-appellees to strike new matter filed by the defendant-appellant which raised as a defense a release which allegedly discharged defendant-appellant from liability. The motion to strike alleged the *308release was obtained in violation of the Act of June 9, 1972, P.L. 359, No. 97, § 1, 12 P.S. § 1630 (Supp.1977-78). The defendant-appellant appealed from the order granting the motion to strike to the Superior Court. The Superior Court affirmed per curiam. The defendant-appellant filed a petition for…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adcox v. PA. MFGRS'ASSN. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Adcox v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rosenwald v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Tate v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Weiss v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Deemer v. OrosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API