Legal Opinion

Crockett v. Village of Barre

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Case for an injury received upon the highway within the limits of the defendant village. Heard upon general demurrer to the declaration at the June term, 1893, Orange county, Start, J., presiding. The court pro forma overruled the demurrer. The defendant excepts. The declaration should allege that the village voted to accept its charter. I Dill. Mun.

Read the full summary

Case for an injury received upon the highway within the limits of the defendant village. Heard upon general demurrer to the declaration at the June term, 1893, Orange county, Start, J., presiding. The court pro forma overruled the demurrer. The defendant excepts. The declaration should allege that the village voted to accept its charter. I Dill. Mun. Cor. s. 83 ; R. L. ss. 3052, 3058; Acts of 1886, No. 190, s. 13 ; Acts of 1890, No. 17, ss. 1, 3. Suppose the village properly organized, it is not under its charter liable for injuries sustained upon its highways. It can levy no tax to pay such…

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

This cause was heard upon general demurrer, to the declaration. The act incorporating the defendant was passed November 24, 1886, to take effect on the third Tuesday in January, 1887, provided a majority of the legal voters of the village voted to accept the provisions of the act. It is objected that there is no allegation that a majority of the legal voters ever voted to accept the articles of incorporation ; a like question as to other conditions of the act is raised. This point is not well taken. A distinct and positive averment of the existence of an artificial person is usually all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ralls County Court v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Church v. Town of WestminsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  3. State v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. O'Roak v. Lloyds Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. McFarland v. GeorgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Londoff v. VuylstekeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Sams v. Cochran & Ross Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Burlington Grocery Co. v. Heaphy's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API