Legal Opinion

Burlington Grocery Co. v. Heaphy's Estate

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is a probate appeal from the disallowance by commissioners of a claim against the estate of the late Thomas J. Heaphy. The defendant moved the county court to dismiss the appeal on the ground, in substance, that the corporate existence of the plaintiff was not alleged. The first exception argued was saved to the overruling of this motion. In both the petition for an appeal and the accompanying declaration the plaintiff is described by name alone, but is referred to by the impersonal pronoun “it” and the petition is subscribed by one Blodgett as vice-president. It may be admitted as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Loomis v. Norman Printers Supply Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Eppens, Smith Wiemann Co. v. . LittlejohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Leader Printing Co. v. LowrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Stanly v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Goodwin, Admx. v. GastonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Widham v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  4. Cauchon v. GladstoneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  5. HENDY BROTHERS, INC. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API