Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Weil

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 3, 1993No. 1912017PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

The original opinion released on April 30, 1993, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor.

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs/purchasers, Sherwood Weil and Leslie Weil, and against the defendants/sellers, Johnny Evans Osborne and Helen D. (Blevins) Osborne, on the Weils' claims alleging fraud, misrepresentation, and deceit arising out of oral and written representations and failures to disclose information about the business, including 7.48 acres of commercial property, known as the "Fishin' Hole," which the Weils purchased from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Aspinwall v. GowensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Southern States Ford, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Leatherwood, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Johnson v. State Farm Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kachler v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  2. Gable v. BolesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Pace v. Colonial Penn Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Russell v. WilsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Bramlett v. Adamson Ford, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API