Legal Opinion

Pace v. Colonial Penn Insurance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1996No. 2950085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. CHARLES WRIGHT, Retired Appellate Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. The relevant facts are as follows:

On July 1, 1991, Greg and Jeannette Roili-son purchased five acres of land, a house, and a barn from James and Sandra Pace. As part of the purchase, the Rollisons executed a vendor’s lien, naming the Paces as lienhold-ers. The purchase price of $100,000 was to be paid through a down payment, plus monthly installments of $945.74. Pursuant to the terms of the lien, the Rollisons obtained fire insurance through Colonial Penn Insurance Company, which listed the Paces as the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Grider v. GriderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Vance v. HuffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. &198tna Ins. Co. v. Baldwin Cty. Bldg. Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. McDonald v. ServproCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Fire and Indem. Co., Inc. v. WeeksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. Pace v. Colonial Penn Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API