Legal Opinion

McReynolds v. American Commerce Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 13, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 The issue before us is whether an insurer may meet its duty to equally consider settlement offers, when presented with multiple claims in excess of policy limits, by promptly and in good faith interpleading its policy limits and continuing to provide a defense to its insured. Holding this is so, we affirm the summary judgment entered.

Facts and Procedural History

¶2 Michael McReynolds (“McReynolds”) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Commerce Insurance Co. (“ACIC”). McReynolds sustained severe injuries in an automobile accident with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Zilisch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Oliver Davis and Lillie Mae DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lennar Corp. v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Bradley Baldwin, As Assignee of Tommi C. Hummel and Travor Hummel v. The Standard Fire Insurance CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Davis v. American Alternative Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API