Pierce v. C. H. Bidwell Thresher Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Case by Loren D. Pierce against the O. H. Bidwell Thresher Company for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
In an action for damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff by breaking through the deck of a bean threshing machine manufactured by defendant company, plaintiff recovered a judgment. The case was before this court for review after a former trial. It is reported (Pierce v. Bidwell Thresher Co.) 153 Mich. 323 (116 N. W. 1104). Comparing the record now under consideration with that before the court in the former case, we find that a restatement of the facts will not be necessary and refer to the statement in the opinion reported. It is claimed by appellant in its brief that—
“ There is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pierce v. C. H. Bidwell Thresher Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- The Queen of the PacificUnited States Circuit Court · 1885