Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Huikari

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1966No. 11045Published

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

This is an action of contract under a common count to recover $2,166.00 for cranberries sold and delivered to the plaintiff on November 4, 1959.

The answer is a general denial.

The court found for the plaintiff.

All of the evidence introduced in this trial is set out in case No. 11011, Huikari v. Eastman, 35 Mass. App. Dec. 95, and such evidence is incorporated be reference in this opinion.

As in the other case, the plaintiff objected to the admission of certain exhibits purporting to show the action of the government with respect to the confiscation of certain cranberries. There was no harmful…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. RocheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Nicoli v. BerglundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Bankoff v. Coleman Bros.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Restuccia v. BonnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Cohen v. PetersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API