Legal Opinion

Teacle v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 1, 1919No. 23778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Suit between T. C. Barrett and. another, wherein Mrs. Caroline Teacle and others were cited as defendants, and, writ of possession having issued at tbe instance of Barrett, tbe other defendants applied for injunction, which was granted, but dissolved on rule to show cause, and Mrs. Teacle and others apply for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtPr-Ovosty, J.

A suit was brought against T. C. Barrett by a neighbor for fixing the boundary between their lands. In his answer to the suit he conceded the necessity of the boundary line being established, but alleged that whatever land the line thus to be fixed might take from him he would be entitled to a like quantity from his neighbor on the other side, Mrs, Teacle and her children, the relators in the instant proceeding, and he asked that the line be at the same time fixed as between him and them, and that they be cited. They joined in the suit; their defenses being: First, that the line between…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. A. Lehman & Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  2. State v. ColbertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Page v. PinckardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  4. State v. HinceySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. Department of Conservation v. Louisiana Gas & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woulfe v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  2. Hartsell v. Hooker Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. American Universal Insurance v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Standard Machine Co. v. Melancon-Bourgeois Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API