Legal Opinion
American Universal Insurance v. Coleman
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1960No. 5053PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
■The sole issue of this appeal is whether a judgment of garnishment holding a garnishee liable to the judgment creditor for the judgment debtor’s debt may be signed when the court is in vacation.
The plaintiff, having earlier in another court obtained a judgment against Coleman, filed in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court these garnishment proceedings under a writ of fieri facias against Jack’s Cookie Co., Inc., alleging that the said garnishee is indebted unto Coleman. See Code of Practice, Articles 246, 247, 262, and 263. Service of the petition for garnishment and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vercher v. RoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Green v. Marquette Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- State ex rel. Illinois Central Railroad v. Judges of the Fourth Circuit Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Sparks v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. Underwriters at Lloyd's of LondonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hartsell v. Hooker Chemical Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973