Hershel Radio Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Hershel Radio Company, a copartnership, plaintiff, brought suit against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, ’ defendant, and the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, codefendant. Upon dismissal of the case against the codefendant (Hershel Radio Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, 334 Mich 148) plaintiff filed an amended declaration against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company as sole defendant. Pennsylvania’s liability, if any, stems from the fact that it is a connecting or delivering carrier. 49 HSCA, § 20(11). Plaintiff contends that defendant is liable for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kinnick Bros. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Modern Tool Corp. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
- Perkel v. Pennsylvania RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
- Hershel Radio Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Standard Hotel Supply Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- D. H. Overmyer Co. v. Nelson-Brantley Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Jefferson Maintenance Co. v. Detroit Electrotype Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Jefferson Maintenance Co. v. Detroit Electrotype Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967