Legal Opinion
Modern Tool Corp. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 25, 1951No. Civ. A. 138-49PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
This is an action to recover for damages to two (2) used Landis Grinders damaged in transit from Buffalo, New York, to Harrison, New Jersey.
On March 29, 1948, the War Assets Administration, through” the Frontier Contracting Co., Inc., consigned to Modern Tool Corporation two (2) Landis Grinders together with one (1) Cincinnati Milling Machine, comprising a carload shipment. The freight car containing these machines was loaded by the shipper on the shipper’s private siding. The car was sealed and the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad delivered it to' the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Lewis MacH. Co. v. Aztec Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Alabama & V. Ry. Co. v. American Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
- Blytheville Cotton Oil Co. v. KurnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Ross v. Troy & Boston RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McComish v. DeSoiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- The Dublin Company v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company v. Metal-Matic, Inc., Metal-Matic, Inc. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Automated Donut Systems, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.