Legal Opinion

Thayer v. City of Rawlins

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1979No. 4991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

This appeal concerns the rights of the defendant water users to effluent water discharged by the City of Rawlins. By virtue of water rights dating from 1900, the City of Rawlins has imported all of its municipal water supplies from the North Platte River and from Sage Creek, a tributary of the North Platte River. After using the water for municipal purposes, the City has historically discharged the resulting effluent into a channel, known as Sugar Creek, which connects with the North Platte River. In the past, the point of this discharge was above the points at which the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Basin Electric Power Cooperative v. State Board of ControlWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. Wyoming Hereford Ranch v. Hammond Packing Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Stevens v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bower v. Big Horn Canal Ass'n.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Montana v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Arizona Public Service Co. v. LongArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Whitt v. Hat Bar Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Arizona Public Service Co. v. LongArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Arizona Public Service Co. v. LongArizona Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API