Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Farmers' Hardware Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1931No. 5 Div. 84PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

Counsel for the parties have thoughtfully and aptly made up the record and filed briefs to present a single question of law, viz.: Is an action by a materialman on a contractor’s bond, given to secure performance of a contract with the state, county, or municipality for the construction of a public school building, governed by the “six months’ ” statute of limitation under the Act of February 10th, 1927 (Gen. Acts 1927, p. 37); or is it governed by the “sixty days’ ” limitation prescribed by section 28, subd. b of the Act of August 23, 1927 (Gen. Acts 1927, p. 356)? Briefly stated, does the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Prowell v. State ex rel. HastySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Allgood v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Mills v. Court of Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  2. Fletcher v. Tuscaloosa Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Heck v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. State v. Bay Towing & Dredging CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Shiv-Ram, Inc. v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API