Legal Opinion
Bureau Veritas Commodities and Trade, Inc. v. Nanoo
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided May 26, 2021No. 2:20-cv-03374Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BUREAU VERITAS COMMODITIES CIVIL ACTION AND TRADE, INC. VERSUS NO. 20-3374 RENISHA NANOO, ET AL. SECTION “R” (4) ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court are two motions to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by defendants Renisha Nanoo1 and Cotecna Inspections, Inc.2 Cotecna also moves in the alternative under Rule 12(e) for a more definite statement.3 Plaintiff Bureau Veritas Commodities and Trade, Inc. opposes the motions.4 As discussed below, the Court grants the Rule 12(b)(6) motions in part and denies the motions in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Brand Coupon Network, LLC v. Catalina Marketing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- King v. DoganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.