Legal Opinion

Zoesch

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 19, 1980No. 374-80CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This military pay case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff contends that he has been wrongfully denied retired pay under 10 U.S.C. §1331, et. seq. (1976). The principal factual issue is whether plaintiff had at least twenty years of qualifying service in the military. The Government interposes the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. §2501 (1970). We grant the Government’s motion.

Plaintiff, Arnold B. Zoesch, enlisted in the United States Navy on September 21, 1942, and served on active duty until October 23, 1946. During the ensuing twenty years, plaintiff served…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Cooper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Bruno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  4. Kutz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Carver v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gerber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Acker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Hamon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. Hannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API