Legal Opinion

Schiller v. Small

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Shoshone County. No briefs filed on motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtHuston, J.

These are appeals from the same judgment and order denying motion for new trial. A motion to dismiss in each case is made upon the grounds: 1. That the appeal was not taken in time; 2. That no undertaking on appeal has been filed.

The action was for a foreclosure of a mortgage.- Decree was entered June 27, 1893. Notice of appeal was filed on June 29, 1894, and served on July 21, 1894. The appeal was not taken within the year prescribed by statute. The appeal was taken from both the judgment and the order denying motion for a new trial. The undertaking is conditioned for the payment of all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Eddy v. Van NessIdaho Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Mathison v. LelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1878
  4. McCoy v. OldhamIdaho Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Robson v. ColsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rosenbaum v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API