Eddy v. Van Ness
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Alturas County. In this case there is nothing in the briefs of either party on the point upon which the cause was dismissed, to wit, want of an undertaking on appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.
In this case the appellants filed and served notice of appeal, both from the order refusing a new trial and from the judgment. The appeal in this case and the undertaking placed on file are precisely the same as the appeal and undertaking in the case of Mathison v. Leland, 1 Idaho, 712. The undertaking recites that the appellants are about to appeal from the judgment made and entered against them, and also from the order denying a new trial, and then undertakes to pay all costs and damages which may be awarded against them on the appeal or dismissal thereof, not exceeding $300. The court say,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mathison v. LelandIdaho Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by8 opinions
- Motherwell v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1886
- Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1892
- Young v. TinerIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
- Kelly v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Nolan v. Montana Central Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.