Mathison v. Leland
Idaho Supreme Court
Appeal from the first judicial district, Idaho county. Motion to dismiss the appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHollistee, C. J.
Priokett, J., concurred. Clark, J., having been of counsel, took no part in the hearing or decision.
This is a motion by the respondent to dismiss the appeal from the order denying a motion for a new trial, and from the judgment of the court below, on the ground, among other things, of the want of sufficient undertaking. It appears from the transcript that the appeal was taken, both from the order denying the motion for a new trial and from the judgment. To render such an appeal effectual, it is necessary, under the statute, that there should be two undertakings, which may be in one or…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Motherwell v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1886
- Cronin v. Bear Creek Gold Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1892
- Eddy v. Van NessIdaho Supreme Court · 1885
- Schiller v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1895
- Robson v. ColsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.