State v. Forte
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
A jury found defendant guilty of three counts of sexual assault. The trial court granted defendant a new trial “in the interests of justice,” V.R.Cr.P. 83, on the principal ground that a prosecutor exhibited before the jury such extraordinary emotional involvement in securing a conviction that defendant was denied a fair trial. The State seeks review of that ruling here by way of a petition for extraordinary relief pursuant to V.R.A.P. 21(b). We dismiss the petition without prejudice to its renewal in superior court.
We recognize that the State has no procedural avenue to appeal the court’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Gene McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- State v. LaphamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ForteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Douglas v. Windham Superior CourtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. VerrinderSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. OrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Chrysler Corp. v. MakovecSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.