Legal Opinion

In re Miltones, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 22, 1922No. 63PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

The order now appealed from is the same for all substantial purposes as that referred to in the previous case. In re Miltones, Inc. (C. C. A.) 279 Fed. 105. In reversing the previous order, we pointed out the necessity of clear findings of fact, in order that we might consider questions of law, if any, in view of the limits of review on a petition to revise. In a case of this character, the settled practice in this circuit had been to file a petition to revise. In re Frasin, 201 Fed. 343, 120 C. C. A. 391 (inadvertently cited in 279 Fed. at page 106, as 201 Fed. 86, 119…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nagel v. KrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. In re FrasinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
  3. In re Miltones, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. In re FrazinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Everet L. Hagan v. George L. Gardner, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Flintridge Heights, Inc., a Bankrupt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. In Re Childs Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. Schifrin v. Chenille Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. In re Iroquois Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. Swift & Co. v. LickliderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API