Legal Opinion
In re Iroquois Utilities, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 3, 1924No. 289PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). [1] We have repeatedly pointed out that, on a petition to revise, we do not review the facts but consider only questions of law. In re Nagel (C. C. A.) 278 Fed. 105; In re B. & R. Glove Corp. (C. C. A.) 279 Fed. 372; In re Miltones (C. C. A.) 286 Fed. 806.
We have also stated that “we take the facts as found by the District Court,” and, where there are no specific findings of fact, we look to *401the opinion, if any, of the District Court. In re Nagel, supra; In re Miltones (C. C. A.) 279 Fed. 106.
Bearing this practice in mind, we have no occasion to inquire…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Eyster v. GaffSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jerome v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- In re RohrerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- In re B. & R. Glove Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- In Re Greenlie-Halliday Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- In Re RuskayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- American Range & Foundry Co. v. Mercantile Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- In re WinterDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.