Legal Opinion

O'CONNELL v. Will

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2011No. S-13540Published

1Opinion of the Court

263 P.3d 41 (2011)

Kevin O'CONNELL, Appellant,

v.

Anthony WILL and Paulette Will, Appellees.

No. S-13540.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

October 28, 2011.

Yale H. Metzger, Law Offices of Yale H. Metzger, Anchorage, for Appellant.

No appearance by Appellees.

Before: CARPENETI, Chief Justice, FABE, WINFREE, CHRISTEN, and STOWERS, Justices.

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2002 Kevin O'Connell was awarded damages against Anthony and Paulette Will for the Wills' failure to pay a promissory note. Under the attorney's fee provision in the note, O'Connell was also awarded full attorney's fees and costs.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Strenge v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Keller v. FrenchAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API