Legal Opinion

Blood v. Gibbons

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 18, 1980No. [No. 131, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

In this case we are presented with the narrow question of the proper construction of a forfeiture clause in a real estate contract for the sale of a private residence. The clause at issue becomes operative upon a breach of the contract by the buyer. At least two remedies are available under this provision — the right to forfeit the earnest money deposit, and the right to bring suit for compensatory damages for breach of contract. We must decide whether the seller is contractually restricted to elect only one of such remedies, or whether the seller may avail himself of both remedies when his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Alois v. WaldmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Burroughs Corp. v. Chesapeake Petroleum & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Casey v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schrier v. Beltway Alarm Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Gonsalves v. BingelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Ecology Services, Inc. v. Granturk Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  4. Miller v. United States Naval InstituteCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Greentree Series V, Inc. v. HofmeisterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API