Legal Opinion
Sharon L.R. MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF TUCSON, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 1986No. 85-2561PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, District Judge:
The City of Tucson appeals from the district court’s ruling that the City violated Title VII and the Equal Pay Act by engaging in sex-based wage discrimination against the plaintiff Sharon Maxwell. We affirm.
Background
Maxwell has been employed by the City since 1972. From January 1976 to August 1978 she held the position of Research Analyst within the Citizen Participation Program. 1 During most of this period, the Program was headed by Mr. Fred Acosta who held the position of Director. The position of Director was classified at a pay grade of Range 50. 2 While Acosta…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- County of Washington v. GuntherSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lynn Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Christine Plemer v. Parsons-Gilbane, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Stanley v. University of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Marilyn M. Mulhall v. Advance Security, Inc., Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Grigoletti v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Belfi v. PrendergastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.