Legal Opinion

Andresen v. Andresen

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 10, 1989No. 111PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

Ruth Andresen seeks to share in her husband Ralph’s military retirement pay. She was denied this relief when *382the trial court dismissed her motion to modify a decree of divorce.

Ruth and Ralph were divorced in Maryland on November 13, 1981, after some forty years of marriage. The decree of divorce incorporated a handwritten settlement agreement between the parties which provided the following: Ralph would pay Ruth $500 in alimony per month for five years, Ralph would contribute $425 toward Ruth’s attorney’s fee, and the parties would divide the cost of the divorce action. Neither…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Stringfellow v. StringfellowMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. In Re the Marriage of FlannaganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Smith v. SmithDelaware Family Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. LVNV Funding LLC v. FinchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Porter v. PorterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Autobahn Motors, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API