Legal Opinion

Autobahn Motors, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 1991No. 145, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRY A. COLE, Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to decide whether an error in a legal description contained in an Inquisition, which was inconsistent with the evidence presented at trial, constitutes an irregularity under Maryland Rule 2-535(b), sufficient to set aside an enrolled judgment.

The circumstances leading to this appeal arose in 1987 when Respondent, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (“City”), filed a petition for condemnation of certain properties owned by Petitioner, Autobahn Motors, Inc. (“Autobahn”). A jury trial was held in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in which the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berwyn Fuel & Feed Co. v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Weitz v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Platt v. PlattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. J.T. Masonry Co. v. Oxford Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Montgomery County v. REVERE NATIONAL CORP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Early v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Mercy Medical Center, Inc. v. United Healthcare of Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API