Legal Opinion

Standard Varnish Works v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 11477PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The purpose of this proceeding is to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. Richard W. Minderman, a minor of the age of sixteen years, was employed on July 2, 1924, as assistant shipping clerk by the petitioner, Standard Varnish Works, a corporation. The petitioner, State Compensation Insurance Fund, is the insurance carrier. About three weeks after the employment began the young man was killed in an elevator accident. It is conceded that the accident arose out of and in the course of the employment. At the time of his death he was receiving wages from said corporation at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Spreckels Sugar Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Great Western Power Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Great Western Power Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Market Street Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Louden v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Wickstrom v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API