Bievenour v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review disallowed the appeal of Lewis J. Bievenour (Bievenour) from a referee’s denial of benefits. He appeals to us. We affirm.
Is Section 4(1) (4) (5) of the Unemployment Compensation Law1 (Act) which provides that the word “employment” shall not include “service performed by an individual in the employ of his son, daughter, or spouse, and service performed by a child under the age of eighteen (18) in the employ of his father or mother” constitutional? Bievenour, last employed as a carpenter by a hardware store under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. MolitorisCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Hammond v. MarxDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Procito v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Grossinger v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Prince v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Rosler v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.