Legal Opinion

Prince v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Lilyan M. Prince (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that denied her claim for unemployment benefits. In doing so, the Board affirmed the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Referee (Referee) that Claimant was ineligible for benefits because she was employed by her son. We affirm.

The facts in this matter are not in dispute. Claimant was employed by Prince and Prince, a law firm wholly owned by her son, Paul A. Prince, Esq. Claimant was employed part-time as the law firm’s librarian, and after…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Curtis v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Wallace v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Procito v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Procito v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API