Prince v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Lilyan M. Prince (Claimant) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that denied her claim for unemployment benefits. In doing so, the Board affirmed the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Referee (Referee) that Claimant was ineligible for benefits because she was employed by her son. We affirm.
The facts in this matter are not in dispute. Claimant was employed by Prince and Prince, a law firm wholly owned by her son, Paul A. Prince, Esq. Claimant was employed part-time as the law firm’s librarian, and after…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Curtis v. KlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Wallace v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Procito v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Procito v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008