Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Marx
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 31, 1975No. Civ. No. 2045 NDPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
406 F.Supp. 853 (1975)
Thomas W. HAMMOND, III, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
Richard E. MARX et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 2045 ND.
United States District Court, D. Maine, N. D.
December 31, 1975.
Thomas W. Hammond, III, pro se.
Martin L. Wilk, Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, Me., John E. McKay and Bernard J. Kubetz, Bangor, Me., for defendants.
Before COFFIN, Chief Circuit Judge, and GIGNOUX and BOWNES, District Judges.
OPINION
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief and damages challenging the constitutional validity of a Maine statute setting a minimum age for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Leary v. WisecupCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Black v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1983
- Bievenour v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979