Legal Opinion

Maier v. Harbor Center Land Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1919No. Civ. No. 2838PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. E. Crothers, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the cancellation of a contract for the purchase of a lot of land, and for the recovery of moneys paid thereunder.

The facts are that Maier, a minor under the age of eighteen, entered into a contract with appellant for the purchase of a lot of land for one thousand two hundred dollars. He ; paid $120 as an initial installment, and from time to time thereafter paid monthly installments, taxes, and interest, amounting in all to $378.05. Before arriving at the age of twenty-one he disaffirmed the contract, and, through…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flittner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. PallaresAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1952
  2. People v. PallaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Sparks v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Tracy v. GaudinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API