Legal Opinion
Arch Mineral Corp. v. Babbitt
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided August 1, 1995No. Civ. A. 2:95-0032PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
Pending are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties agree there are no genuine issues of material fact extant. They have submitted memoranda in support of their respective positions and the matter is mature for the Court’s consideration.
STIPULATED FACTS
Greendale Coals, Incorporated conducted coal mining operations beginning in 1983 on property in Clay and Nicholas Counties, West Virginia under three mining permits issued by the West Virginia Department of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ed Peters Jewelry Co. v. C & J Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Cat Run Coal Co. v. BabbittDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
- DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENV. v. KleinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Arch Mineral Corporation v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Dine Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment v. KleinDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.