Legal Opinion
Araujo v. Coachella Valley Water District
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 12, 2022No. 3:20-cv-01800Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARISSA ARAUJO (SURVIVAL Case No.: 20-cv-01800-AJB-RBM ACTION), et al., 12 ORDER: Plaintiffs, 13 v. (1) GRANTING COACHELLA 14 VALLEY WATER DISTRICT’S COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 15 MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT DISTRICT; THE COUNTY OF OPINIONS OF DR. DAVID 16 IMPERIAL; JOSUE GONZALEZ; and FRACTOR; DOES 1 TO 25, inclusive, 17 Defendants. (2) GRANTING IN PART AND 18 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DENYING IN PART THE 19 DISTRICT, COUNTY’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT OPINIONS OF DR. ILENE 20 Cross-Complainant, ZACKOWITZ; 21 v. (3)…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.