Legal Opinion

Peebles v. Commissioners of Davie County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from an order of Injunction made at Fall Term;. 1879, of Davie Superior Court, by Gilmer, J. The injunction granted was continued to the hearing, and' the defendants appealed. The facts of the case are substantially set out in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The cause is before us on the appeal of the-defendants from an interlocutory order of injunction, to continue in force until the hearing, restraining them from- subscribing in the name of their county to the capital stock of the "Winston, Salem and Mooresville railroad company .■and issuing bonds in payment therefor. The action is brought by the plaintiff on behalf of himself and other residents and tax payers in Davie county, and he insists that a majority of the qualified voters of the county have not voted for and authorized the proposed subscription as required by the act of March 5,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  2. Swain v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gatling v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Morris v. . WillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Western North Carolina Railroad v. Georgia & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Dunkart v. . RineheartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Pratley v. State ex rel. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API