Legal Opinion

Dunkart v. . Rineheart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil AotioN tried at Spring Term, 1883, of Haywood Superior Court, before Avery, J. The plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The plaintiff, in the statement of h'is cause of action, alleges that the defendant Rineheart entered into a written contract with him, for the sale of black walnut trees, in the following form :

“ WayNESVIeue, N. C., February 23, 1881.
“I, William Rineheart, of Waynosville, N. C., agree to sell unto Henry Dunkart, of Asheville, N. C., any of my black walnut trees, not exceeding fifteen in number, that will girth eight feet six inches in circumference, and under ten feet, at $2 each, and all trees measuring ten feet in circumference and upwards at §2.50 each. I also agree to give the necessary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakely v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Green v. . the North Carolina Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Thornburg v. . MastenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Peebles v. Commissioners of Davie CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Young v. . GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lumber Co. v. Corey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Carpenter v. . MedfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Morris v. . ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Forehand v. Edenton Farmers Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API