Legal Opinion

Knapper v. Connick

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 15, 1996No. 96-C-0434PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

681 So.2d 944 (1996)

Issac KNAPPER

v.

Harry F. CONNICK and David Paddison.

No. 96-C-0434.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

October 15, 1996.

Bruce Steven Kingsdorf, Cleveland, Barrios, Kingsdorf & Casteix, New Orleans, for applicant.

Bruce Gerard Whittaker, Michael Riehlmann, Laurie A. White, William F. Wessel, Charlotte Ann Lagarde, Wessel, Bartels & Ciaccio, New Orleans, for respondent.

Ellis Paul Adams, Jr., for Louisiana District Attorneys Association (Amicus Curiae).

Patricia Nailey Bowers, for Walter Reed, District Attorney (Amicus Curiae).

MARCUS, Justice.[*]

In 1979, Issac Knapper was indicted by an…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hudson v. City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  3. Kristin Loupe v. Robin O'BannonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  4. Renata Singleton v. Leon Cannizzaro, Jr., eCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  5. Czechorowski v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API