State Ex Rel. Memmel v. Mundy
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
In point of time or place, the respondents’ petition for declaratory relief is a caboose added to an already long freight train. However, we consider first that petition for declaratory relief for the reasons that (1) a declaration of rights is an appropriate vehicle for an exercise of the superintending control over inferior courts, constitutionally granted to this court, 1 and involved in the determinations here made; and (2) such petition deals with future pro cedures to be followed — the major concerns of the parties here involved.
Additionally, the appeal here is only of the circuit court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
- Lynch v. BaxleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974
- Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Conservatorship of RouletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Commitment of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Harrah v. LeveretteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. McMillian v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.