Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Memmel v. Mundy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1977No. 76-170PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

In point of time or place, the respondents’ petition for declaratory relief is a caboose added to an already long freight train. However, we consider first that petition for declaratory relief for the reasons that (1) a declaration of rights is an appropriate vehicle for an exercise of the superintending control over inferior courts, constitutionally granted to this court, 1 and involved in the determinations here made; and (2) such petition deals with future pro cedures to be followed — the major concerns of the parties here involved.

Additionally, the appeal here is only of the circuit court…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  4. Lynch v. BaxleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974
  5. Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Conservatorship of RouletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Commitment of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Harrah v. LeveretteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. McMillian v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API