Conservatorship of Roulet
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
In this case, the court must decide if proof beyond a reasonable doubt and a unanimous jury verdict are the proper standards to apply before a conservator can be appointed under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act’s (LPS Act) grave disability provisions,1 with the power to involuntarily commit a conservatee to a state mental institution for up to a year.
*222I
In December 1974, respondent, the Public Guardian of the County of Santa Barbara, was named conservator of the person and estate of appellant, Mabel Roulet. Respondent was given the power to confine appellant in a mental…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Department of Social Services v. Ronald P.California Supreme Court · 1981
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Ben C.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Conservatorship of HofferberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.