Legal Opinion

Bank v. . McEwen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 13, 1912PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by MR. JUSTICE WALKER. This case was brought here by the appeal of the plaintiff from an order upon a motion of the defendants to set aside a consent judgment, and presents the following facts:

Plaintiff, as a judgment creditor of S.M. McEwen, brought an action by the above title to impeach and set aside two deeds of trust, one executed on 16 October, 1909, by S. M. McEwen and his wife, Nannie B. McEwen, to G. L. Park, as trustee, to secure a debt due to W. J. McEwen for $2,500, which amount had been advanced to the plaintiff by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Holker v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
  2. Bruce v. . NicholsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Henry v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. Governor Ex. Rel. Trustees of University of N. C. v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dwight v. HazlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Gaston-Lincoln Transit, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Budwit v. HerrMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API