Legal Opinion
Rasmussen v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 20, 1976No. 121-75PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Davis, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of the court:
This civilian pay case originated in a National Bureau of Standards reduction-in-force which took Alvin Basmussen, a long-standing employee of the Federal Government, from his GS-13 Physicist position in Colorado and left him in a GS-7 Physicist slot. The focus of the several administrative appeals was Rasmussen’s assignment rights under 5 C.F.R. §§ 351.701,351.703 (1974); the Civil Service Commission had to decide whether Rasmussen was entitled to bump one of two GS-12 Electronics Engineers or whether, instead, he was properly denied those jobs…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Grover v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Andrew Connor v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Aparacor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Thomas C. Baumgardner v. The Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, on Behalf of Blanton B. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Cruz-Casado v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Hondros v. United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.