Legal Opinion
El Comite Para el Bienestar de Earlimart v. Helliker
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 22, 2006No. Civ.S 04 882 LKK/KJMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs and state defendants.1 The suit involves two claims made by plaintiffs effectively brought against several state agencies, under the Clean Air Act (“The Act” or “CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, et seq.2 *916In their first cause of action, plaintiffs, unincorporated associations and non-profit organizations representing members who live and work in affected areas,3 allege that defendants failed to adopt and implement regulations by June 15, 1997 as required by the California State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Friends of the Earth v. Hugh CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Baughman v. Bradford Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Citizens for a Better Environment v. DeukmejianDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1990
- Entergy Services, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- El Comite Para El Bienestar De Earlimart v. WarmerdamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- El Comité Para El Bienestar De Earlimart v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- EL COMITE PARA EL BIENESTAR EARLIMART v. HellikerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
- El Comité Para El Bienestar De Earlimart v. WarmerdamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008