Legal Opinion
Baughman v. Bradford Coal Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 5, 1979No. 78-1764PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COOLAHAN, Senior District Judge.
Several residents of Bigler, Pennsylvania filed this action under the Clear Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., against the Bradford Coal Company (“Bradford”) alleging that the Bradford coal processing plant located in Bigler violated the Pennsylvania Implementation Plan.1 Bradford brought *217an interlocutory appeal, duly authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from the denial of its motion to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
The complaint in the District Court was filed on December 27, 1976. Well before that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Friends of the Earth v. Hugh CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- City of Highland Park v. TrainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Volkswagen De Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Nelson v. Real Estate CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Pmc, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Friends of the Earth v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Texans United for a Safe Economy Education Fund v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Sun Buick, Inc. v. Saab Cars Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Porter Trust v. Rural Water Sewer & Solid Waste Management District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.