El Comité Para El Bienestar De Earlimart v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHROEDER, Senior Circuit Judge:
We deal with another phase of California’s efforts to create a “Pesticide Element” for its State Implementation Plan (“SIP”) that meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. This is a challenge by several community organizations to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) 2012 approval of revisions and additions to California’s Pesticide Element relating to the reduction of volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”), precursors of ozone, in the San Joaquin and Ventura air basins.
In an earlier decision involving the Pesticide…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Campesinos Unidos, Inc. v. United States Department of Labor, Center for Employment Training, Intervenor-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- El Comite Para El Bienestar De Earlimart v. WarmerdamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sierra Club v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Yazzie v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Alaska Wilderness League v. JewellDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2015
- Montana Environmental Info. v. Debra ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Central CA Environmental Justice Network v. RandolphDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Sarker v. Director, TDCJ-CIDDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.