Legal Opinion

Coyne v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1951No. Civ. 18318PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICKERS, J. pro tem.

Action for damages for false imprisonment. Judgment for plaintiff.

Plaintiff-respondent filed suit against the appellant Ebbert, a police officer, and several other defendants for damages for false imprisonment. After trial before the court without a jury, the plaintiff having dismissed as to the defendants Dan Nelson and L. M. Nevarez, the court gave judgment against the appellant’ and the defendants Michael Krempels and James Snyder for. $750, as compensatory damages, and against the appellant and the defendant Michael Krempels for $500, as punitive damages. Thereafter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Hughes v. OrebCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Kaufman v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gill v. EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Gibson v. JC Penney Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Denbo v. SennessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Caruso v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Baines v. BradyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API