Legal Opinion

Linneweber v. Supreme Council Catholic Knights of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1916No. Civ. No. 1823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action brought to recover the sum of two thousand dollars alleged to be due to plaintiffs from the defendant upon a beneficial policy or certificate of insurance issued by the latter to one James Martin, and made payable to “Bernard Linneweber, or in case of his.death to his children,” as the beneficiaries thereof.

The facts of the case, out of which the defendant’s liability is alleged to have arisen, are contained in an agreed statement of facts presented at the trial of the cause, and which is substantially as follows: The policy or certificate of membership of James…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benjamin v. District Grand Lodge No. 4California Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gaffney v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Howard v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Christin v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Krauss v. Brooklyn Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API