Rhea v. Hackney
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.
The principal question presented in this case is the authority of .a court of law, independent of court rule or statute, and in the exercise of its inherent judicial power, to strike as' sham pleas interposed by a defendant which are shown to be false and filed merely for delay, though apparently good on their face and verified in legal form, and thereupon to give plaintiff a final judgment against the defendant as upon default for want of any defense whatsoever. The court below ruled in the affirmative. The resulting judgment entered by that court has been brought here on writ of error sued…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The People v. . McCumberNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FrazeIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- State ex rel. Engelhard v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. Wilkes Barre & Hazelton RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Larco v. CasaneuavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Riley v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Cunha v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Young v. CurgilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Schaal v. RaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Guaranty Life Insurance v. Hall Brothers Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.