Legal Opinion
Bearden v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 15, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-1777PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Court’s order of October 8, 1985, both sides have rebriefed the issue of statutory notice of termination. The Court, having reviewed these briefs and examined the law on its own, is now ready to rule on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
A review of the background facts as set out in the Court’s order of October 8, 1985, would be helpful. On March 31, 1980 J.T. Burkey and Dena F.J. Burkey gave defendant John Hancock a first mortgage on certain farm ground to secure a loan. In July of 1981, the Burkeys orally leased part of that farm…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Little Redhouse, Brady Tah, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Quality Ford Sales, Inc., a Utah Corporation, and Thomas E. ReddCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Kage v. 1795 Dunn Road, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Pomon v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
- Wilson v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Estate of SauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Bearden v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Citizens Bank & Trust v. Brothers Construction & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1993