Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mendoza
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 2, 2006No. CIV.02-1141 PHX ROS, CIV.03-164 PHX ROSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Certification to the Arizona Supreme Court
SILVER, District Judge.
On February 7, 2006, State Farm filed a Motion for Reconsideration; or Alternatively, Motion for Certification of Question to the Arizona Supreme Court. Pursuant to Rule 27, Rules of the Supreme Court of Arizona, this Court certifies to the Arizona Supreme Court the following issue: whether the duty of equal consideration arises when an insurer in a multiple claimant case has offered to pay its policy limits in a settlement for its insured but the claimants demand an amount in excess of the insurance policy.
I. Question of Law to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Harvey E. Yates Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Fulton v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Paul Croteau v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PeatonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Northern Management Services, Inc. v. Navigators Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022